Death of North Korea’s Foreign Minister
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
The death of North Korea’s foreign minister, Paek Nam-sun, will not put an obstacle on in Korea’s path. This foreign minister, had little power, due to the highly authoritarian regime of Kim Jong-il. Although Kim expressed his condolences for Paek, he will not set back the foreign policy of this country.
Kim Jong-il has held most power over his country in many aspects, limiting the power of his advisers and ministers. Since 1998, Paek Nam-sun has been a major supporter of the controversial nuclear program under global attack today. Fortunately, for the safety of society, the true ideology of communism, and the rest of the world, this dangerously influenced man has passed away at 78.
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Ironic, really; South Korea’s FM becomes Secretary General of the UN, North Korea’s FM dies.
Comment by Archaix January 6, 2007 @ 6:51 am“the true ideology of communism”
seriously, isn’t communism an old troph? or are you talking of a reformed communism with new ideals and if so, why is a reformed communism better than a reformed democracy? i’m seriously looking for a dialouge, not a pissing contest (anyway i’m a dog, i’ll piss longer) no really, i’m interested in what you have to say about my question-
Comment by dogonablog January 7, 2007 @ 12:43 amCommunism IS democratic, that’s one of the underlying points. You’re quite correct in making the distinction from the Stalinist and Maoist ideas of Communism and the new, democratic kind that we sponsor. The idea is to create equality and the purest form of direct democracy possible.
We don’t really like dictators.
Comment by Archaix January 7, 2007 @ 3:44 pmYeah, the true ideology of communism, which most people are blind towards.
True be told, most Americans think communism is a one person dictatorship where many people are put to work to death or they are starved or insanely killed. They think there are less freedoms, less rights, and absolutely no democracy. You know why people think this way? Before the Cold War, and even both World Wars, communism was a widely accepted form of government (except for strict capitalist countries like the US and Britain where they thought communism would take away from the leader’s power to dictate, the economy would slow down, and the rich feared they would loose power). After this period, so much propaganda was put into everyone’s brains about the fake communism stated above by using non communist leaders like Stalin, Kim Jong-il and the last Romanian communist leader who was executed. These people may have declared themselves communist, only to gain power – after gaining power they did everything possible to become rich, be more powerful, and ultimately be dictators. But how many people know who Lenin was? A great communist leader who gave power to the people… How come everyone mentions the bad but never the good? Because Capitalists know that if they teach people the real communism, they loose power.
Comment by Toma January 7, 2007 @ 5:25 pmThat’s exactly it. Marxism basically puts all property into the hands of the people, not just individuals, and the economy is run by the State, WHICH IS RUN BY THE WORKERS. Not by a small Party clique, but the WORKERS, the PEOPLE. Not through a system of bourguoise parliamentary democracy, where every few years you vote for someone you’ve probably never met to go somewhere you’ve probably never been and then expect them to make good decisions for you, but thru a system of direct democracy, through soviets/workers councils. The members of the local council choose which of them will represent them at the sort of congress of councils, and can vote to withdraw their representative and send a different one at any time. That’s real democracy. And with the state running the economy, it can make sure theres always enough jobs to go around, and that goods and products are distributed evenly where they are needed, not thru an unfair system of “you pay, you get”. People are paid according to ther actual value to society, how much their particualar skills are needed and how useful to society as a whole they are, not thru some capitalistic notion of “supply and demand”. This is not to say that the state is in control of everything, that’s where Stalinism appears, in your individual private lives you can do whatever you want, so long as it doesn’t harm others (eg murder, obviously). And everyone isn’t 100% equal in pay and accumen, thats unrealistic and foolish. But the gap between richest and poorest is decreased drastically, so that noone has, say, 10 times more wealth than the people with the least in society (who will have enough, anyway). And people won’t just laze around sponging off the state, either, they will present what skills they have, and be given a job according to that. If you don’t contribute to society, you can’t reap its benefits. You wont starve, but you sure wont live in luxury. The only excuse for not working, and contributing to society, is disability or sickness. From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.
Comment by Comrade Alastair (SocialistUtopia) January 8, 2007 @ 10:05 pm